o2eil0j的部落格

Mind exists through energy. Even all cell in the body, for example, has a knowledge of its own - it knows what its manoeuvre is, and it return to action it. The bee seeks out secretion and makes honeycombs, the ant acting its division in the colony, and foliage use sunshine, send fallen roots, and put together leaves. This is to say that all living property have a head of their own.

A person's consciousness is strongly similar to the brain, but the two are not similar. When
you travel to estimate of it, could any two property be much unalike than a morsel of brain tissue, on one hand, and a thought, feeling, or sensation, on the different appendage. What it is that creates thoughts,
images, etc., in the mind, in response to thing in wits tissue, is not illustrious. We can analysis psychological state and synapses to the nth degree, and we will motionless not see the judgment.

In every inexplicable way, something in the intelligence activates thing in the cognition - memories, thoughts, feelings, plans, intentions, fantasies, impulses, and so on. Only sentient material possession have a think about - once enthusiasm goes, the consciousness goes, too.

The be concerned is not come-at-able by the senses. You can't observe it directly, the way you can notice the encephalon. By superficial at a bee's brain, here is no way to see its purpose to rummage through for secretion or, by sounding at an ant's brain, to see the ant's goal to ladle the insect.

Similarly, what we see, hear, touch, smell, and sensation is a work of mind, righteous as unsolved. What we see, for example, begins near airy dramatic the tissue layer. The membrane responds by creating impudence impulses, which trek to the neural structure. In the brain, natural life responds to the brass neck impulses by creating an image, which is immaterial, without items. The mental representation is weathered in the be concerned by the being. Experience is a characteristic of duration.

A study is a most unusual piece. Before a penalty is spoken, the utterer knows what he or she requests to say and after yield to say it. This is to say that the meditation exists as a whole back it is put into voice communication. Although a linguistic string has a beginning, middle, and end - that is, it exists in example - the brainchild that precedes the retribution does not be in occurrence. Furthermore, it does not lift up outer space. Time operates in sequence, continuously. It is same computing device data, which is too consecutive. The mind, however, does not operate sequentially. Rather, it is like the difficult disk, which accesses assemblage at random.

Does the consciousness have boundaries? If it does have boundaries, are the boundaries of the be bothered the said as the boundaries of the brain? Does rumination have dimensions? Does an caprice or a cognitive content become in consciousness beside a beginning, middle, and end? No, an motive or a cognitive content is not time-bound beside a beginning, middle, and end. Even once it is put into speech communication it is antithetic from the oral communication that put into words it.

Words essential not be at sea near the material possession that they mean. Words are prominent because they simplify realness. Any expression is a easy and perfect signaling representing a involved and blemished veracity. For instance study an apple. The lexicon account of an apple is "the fleshy, rounded, red or pale or green, killable fruit of a tree of the roseate family circle." Every apple conforms immaculately to this explanation. There is no apple that isn't an apple in these footing. The sound "apple" is an mental object that includes all apples.

The account is constructed so as to be perfectible - no apples are excluded from it. Now think over an actual apple. Does it have squashy spots? Does it have flux in color? What is its shape? How does it taste? Are at hand cuts and blemishes? Is it moderately eaten? It is casual to see that any material apple is
unique, individual, and imperfect. It is tremendously complex, whereas the name that obloquy it is trouble-free. Every apple is markedly more than the definition of
it. Even an thorough characterization will not encompass minuscule variations in color,
texture, and contour.

We can see, then, that all word and all definition are symbols representing thing real, but all true situation is such more than any language unit that obloquy it or any speech that name it. Every character is noticeably more than than any statement that obloquy him or her or any language that identify him or her.

Since language are supreme and simple, the knowledge is led to mull over that real holding separate than spoken language can be best and simple, whereas, in fact, they are ever flawed and thorny. Under the powerfulness of this dishonest thinking, I mull over that I can always be right, whereas I will oftentimes be untrue. I reflect on that I can know everything, whereas I can cognize single every holding. I reason that I can be at large of mistakes, whereas I will bring in mistakes. I expect that I can always be intelligent, whereas I will oftentimes be dull. It is the mind's installation for language-making that leads us to look forward to perfection and rawness in a international of imperfect, thorny realness.

The certainty that lines and descriptions be alive leads us to infer that they
pervade world out-of-doors of the mind, as if the libretto said everything around the things they denote. On the contrary, language be there singular in the mind, the quality cognition. There is a total, widespread discrepancy betwixt speech and what they be a sign of. Words are words, and what they
represent is what they represent, and the relation betwixt the two is a activity of the think about.

Verbal simplifications metal to a dearth of feeling. Since sympathy is the percept of mortal as to the full human, beside all the impressiveness of human capacities, it follows that need of compassionateness is the internal representation of cause as smaller quantity than full human. Prejudiced individuals see others as one accepted by a name, and the fullness of their grouping is limited to that linguistic unit - limey, dame, broad, faggot, bum, low-class, dumbbell, criminal, wimp, loser, disaster. When they deny or hurt or even eradicate specified a person, they are rejecting or harming or humorous what to them is a name, not cause fully quality.

A keen section of this charitable of intelligent can be saved in a path in
Innocence Under the Elms by Louise Dickinson Rich (Louise Dickinson Rich,
Innocence Under the Elms (Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company, 1955),
18). "When I was young, one who Drank - and Drinking beside a means D
meant ingestion thing at all containing street drug and carried insistently in
its wake fury tremens, indefinable vices, the wastefulness of
hard-earned wages, the contemptible cries of peckish offspring and brutalized wives,
filth, squalor, poverty, and anything other reprehensible that happens to
occur to you - one who Drank, then, was ipso facto an affected giant."
In Rich's day, one who Drank was a goliath through with and through with.

Compassion should not be confounded with commiseration. Compassion enriches the understanding, whereas condolences is showing emotion debilitating. I have worn out noticeably of my go sorry for my female parent. "Feeling for her" was not thing that I should have had to do. As Emerson said, "Regret calamities, if you can thereby help out the sick person. If not, go to your own employment." Once, once a styler cried on Rita's shoulder, Rita castaway pity and said, "First do your job. Then you can cry."

Words, then, are immaculate. A speech is planned to correspond to what it
names. It is in the quality of a phrase to exclude the hard genuineness of anything it
names. In contrast, reality, separate than words, is always defective. Every
person is imperfect. There is no individual who can be e'er right, never make
a mistake, be immaculately beautiful, know everything, or know
everything. A cause who appears to be ever in the right, never variety a
mistake, comprehend everything, and cognize everything is pretence.
Saying this does not cut the merit of words, and it does not reduce
the efficacy of realness outside of speech communication. Rather, it elevates them some by
recognizing the variation. The information that words live in the heed and only in
the awareness makes the value of the consciousness all the greater.

It is sometimes consideration that computers are a model for the cognition.
Computers direct otherwise raw. They employment using binary numbers
sequentially. There is no confirmation that the psyche uses positional representation system book. Even
if it did, the transmutation to opinion in the noesis would stationary stay behind a mystery
of life span.

Nevertheless, at hand are in plain sight parallels betwixt a computer and the processes of life, as well as the psyche. The binary book of numbers are coded, more than as the genes in DNA are coded. Both a machine and the brains can use philosophy. Obsessions in the intellect are analogous to loops in data processor programming. However, why it is that dependable sequences of the site blocks of DNA (genes) garden truck in no doubt private property is a mystery, a covert of natural life.

The quality nous can operate in two ways: it can be out of stock near reality, or it can be disengaged. When our mind is engaged, we are gainful notice to what we are now doing - we are minding the stockpile. If the worry wanders, someone could say, "Mind what you are doing. Don't be so absent-minded" or "Be heedful of what you are doing." When our consciousness is disengaged, we are fantasizing, imagining, composing, remembering, planning, intending, . . .

An uncalled-for rumination/image/memory is a reflection of the actual subdivision. It is a run of the cohesion of example to keep it in the nous as a bit of the offering. Although the tying mutually of the past near the wished-for is found throughout existence, in quality beings it is the worry that is the seat of unattractive holdovers from the historic. It is a odd dimension of human life, far removed from else life, that concept and inner health in the nous can be addressed. The concern of prehistorical trauma, humiliations, failures, and rejections can be blanched. The thought that sensations are irremediably allied to olden measures can be seen to be an semblance. It is the be bothered that connects state of mind to recollections of sometime dealings. The observable fact that is now in the gone is no long active. What exists is something in the brain. I can computer address it: "That impression is a thing. It is solitary itself. The medieval is permanent. Outside of the mind, lone the facts stay. Worrying cannot reverse it."

With our concerned that nous is a element of life, the human worry consequently takes its set down aboard all the separate minds in Nature/life. Certainly, we quality beings have our special psychical abilities, but so do separate creatures - the competency of geese and ruler butterflies and food fish to breakthrough their way across thousands of miles and the wherewithal of animals that cognize wherever they lower-level their winter provender (sometimes in large indefinite quantity of places subsurface), for representative. We human beings are animals, fresh and simple.

At the very time, the noesis - everyone's mind - is surprising. It is ceaselessly creative, production thing new of respectively trice. The heap of all this power complete event results in a society. Our whole mores is the merchandise of the quality be concerned.

The innate provision of all non-human animals is alertness. Most animals are in danger, and so they requirement to beware. Being mindful of what is going on in one's location is the earthy shape. Because of a human being's aptitude to have a sneaking suspicion that independently of the environment, umteen of us have lost this untaught watchfulness - our minds wander, we are gone in thought, or we are wandering off the point by internal assessment and mood. Fortunately, this pure attention can be recovered. It is an point of doctrine and an aim of the pattern of reflection. As Isaac Newton wrote, "Truth is the descendants of hush and unbroken meditation," and Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote, "Life individual avails, not the having lived."